<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Security for a day &#187; Cisco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chris-mohan.com/category/cisco/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chris-mohan.com</link>
	<description>Securing Windows networks or giving it a go in Australia...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 12:54:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco ASA, Exchange, MessageLabs and Inspect ESTMP don&#8217;t play nicely</title>
		<link>http://www.chris-mohan.com/2009/09/cisco-asa-exchange-messagelabs-and-estmp-filter-dont-play-nicely/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chris-mohan.com/2009/09/cisco-asa-exchange-messagelabs-and-estmp-filter-dont-play-nicely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mohan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chris-mohan.com/?p=436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our Exchange Guru, Ben, was responding to a call about missing emails.  After a bit of searching through logs he noticed consistant time out errors on the mail relay from MessageLabs. The MessageLabs logs were also showing constant retries to the mail relay. Time to blame the Firewall &#8230;. Now, I knew that Cisco PIX  &#8216;fixup [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our Exchange Guru, Ben, was responding to a call about missing emails.  After a bit of searching through logs he noticed consistant time out errors on the mail relay from MessageLabs. The MessageLabs logs were also showing constant retries to the mail relay.</p>
<p>Time to blame the Firewall &#8230;.</p>
<p>Now, I knew that Cisco PIX  &#8216;fixup protocol smtp&#8217; caused Exchange to suffer horribly until it was disabled, but couldn&#8217;t find any offical word on the ASA 8.21 doing the same.</p>
<p>We still had the ESMTP filter in place, as part of Cisco&#8217;s <a title="Understanding Modular Policy Framework " href="http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2009/04/19/understanding-modular-policy-framework/#more-1025" target="_blank">Modular Policy Framework</a> . I removed the &#8220;inspect esmtp&#8221; statement from our global_policy map and instantly the problems disappeared.</p>
<p>CiscoAsa(config)#class inspection_default</p>
<p>CiscoAsa(config-pmap-c)# no inspect ESMTP</p>
<p>Hum Ho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chris-mohan.com/2009/09/cisco-asa-exchange-messagelabs-and-estmp-filter-dont-play-nicely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco ASA &#8211; FTP &amp; HTTP downloads slow</title>
		<link>http://www.chris-mohan.com/2009/08/cisco-asa-ftp-http-downloads-slow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chris-mohan.com/2009/08/cisco-asa-ftp-http-downloads-slow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mohan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chris-mohan.com/2009/08/cisco-asa-ftp-http-downloads-slow/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When calls come in about the Internet being slow, I normally take them with a pinch of salt. This time, a new Cisco ASA had been deployed to a site, so I was more inclined to investigate. The complaints centred around http downloads being much slower before the ASA was deployed; In the case of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When calls come in about the Internet being slow, I normally take them with a pinch of salt. This time, a new Cisco ASA had been deployed to a site, so I was more inclined to investigate.</p>
<p>The complaints centred around http downloads being much slower before the ASA was deployed; In the case of FTP downloads, they were dropping out completely.</p>
<p>The rules and configuration were fine and the traffic throughput was at steady 10mb a second on the ASA. I had a flash back to my old CCNA training, so ran through the basic checks.</p>
<p>The simple <strong>show interface</strong> command to display information on each interface immediately displayed a problem. The internal interface had a massive amount of input errors  and CRC&#8217;s</p>
<p>Ciscoasa# show interface</p>
<p>&#8212;-Snip&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>173687355 packets input, 58611585574 bytes, 0 no buffer</p>
<p>Received 892529 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants</p>
<p>3301144 input errors, 3301144 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0</p>
<p>&#8212;-Snip&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Now that&#8217;s a problem.</p>
<p>Both interfaces on the ASA had been set to speed 100, duplex full. A quick check on the switch connected to the internal ASA interface showed it was set to auto negotiate. By flipping the ASA&#8217;s interface to auto negotiate, the errors stopped dead.</p>
<p>Checked back with the users and the downloads were back to the normal 250kb/sec.</p>
<p>Sometimes, users can be useful for troubleshooting &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chris-mohan.com/2009/08/cisco-asa-ftp-http-downloads-slow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>node verification failed &#8211; SecurID fails after re-building a Cisco ASA</title>
		<link>http://www.chris-mohan.com/2009/02/node-verification-failed-securid-fails-after-re-building-a-cisco-asa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chris-mohan.com/2009/02/node-verification-failed-securid-fails-after-re-building-a-cisco-asa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mohan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chris-mohan.com/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ran in to this little problem after rebuilding a Cisco ASA. Got everything working except for RSA authentication. DNS forward and reverse entries were in place (if you don’t have a PTR record, the ACE server would not automatically resolve the FQDN) and the agent on the RSA windows ACE server was set up and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ran in to this little problem after rebuilding a Cisco ASA.</p>
<p>Got everything working except for RSA authentication.</p>
<p>DNS forward and reverse entries were in place (if you don’t have a PTR record, the ACE server would not automatically resolve the FQDN) and the agent on the RSA windows ACE server was set up and set to all local user authenticate and everything seemed correct.</p>
<p>You need a successful authentication for the shared key to be pass to ASA, so tried to authenticate to ASA with a token and it failed.</p>
<p>On the RSA windows ACE server:</p>
<p>Securid Helpdesk Administrator – Report – Log Monitor – activity monitor set it to monitor the ASA.</p>
<p>node verification failed message was display at each authentication attempt.</p>
<p>We figured that the shared key wasn’t getting to the ASA but couldn’t find any obvious place to find it.</p>
<p>Then we dug out this gem:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">(This is taken directly from the <a href="https://supportwiki.cisco.com/ViewWiki/index.php/SecurID_fails_after_re-ip_addressing_ASA" target="_blank">Ciscowiki</a>)</p>
<p>I read about the .sdi file on the flash of an ASA. So what happens is on the first authentication, the RSA hands down an sdi file to the ASA and this becomes the shared key between the 2 devices.  Since the ASA had an existing key, .sdi file, the way to fix it was to simply delete the file(s).</p>
<p>ASA(config)# dir<br />
Directory of disk0:/</p>
<p>6 drwx 8192 09:18:46 May 31 2008 crypto_archive<br />
91 -rwx 14635008 03:08:24 Aug 12 2008 asa803-k8.bin<br />
92 -rwx 6851212 03:10:56 Aug 12 2008 asdm-603.bin<br />
2 drwx 8192 03:14:44 Aug 12 2008 log<br />
93 -rwx 2153344 11:33:12 Aug 12 2008 anyconnect-win-2.2.0136-k9.pkg<br />
99 -rwx 512 19:01:08 Aug 13 2008 10-100-1-20.sdi</p>
<p>ASA(config)# delete disk0:10-100-1-20.sdi</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">-Chop-</p>
<p>Removed the .sdi file and on the first authentication everything worked as expected.</p>
<p>Thanks anonymous Cisco-guy and THE Bundy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chris-mohan.com/2009/02/node-verification-failed-securid-fails-after-re-building-a-cisco-asa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

