Off to be a CISM, a wonderful CISM of ISACA

Okay if you swap the words out of the song for the Wizards of Oz with the title of this post it sort of works.

Thought I’d give taking ISACA’s Certified Information Security Manager (CISM) certification a go given the large amount of non-IT literate business people I’ve been dealing with needing careful hand holding when it comes to providing security to their operations. These people know their business opertations inside and out until it’s connected to a computer and then it suddenly a black box of mystery.

As part of service to the business we (IT security folk) learn their language, terms and requirements but some business owners seem disinterested in even attempting the understanding the fundamentals of something that’s now critical to their business survival. Is it a simple fear of the unknown or the fear of being mocked for asking someone to explain something they have no understanding of ? Business-crippling IT stories are now filtering into the popular mainstream media, as a few examples:  administrators going mad and faceless people attacking companies from the far side of the world, deleting their web sites and even the very IT security aware companies losing their critical data.

If it makes the business folk feel as if I’m approachable without me having an MBA, seems an easy step to take to help breach that gap.

I’m booked in for the 10 December 2011 exam in Sydney, so better get on with some study.

Fresh faces of GSE candidates at SANS Network Security 2011

Well SANS Network Security 2011 is nearly upon us. The huge event, the GSE practical,that consumed a hefty chunk of my life last year is about to do the same to another embattled batch of GSE candidates.

 

Two of the people I know that have proudly public announced their assault on the GSE exam are Ash* and Dennis I wish them, and their mysterious other exam mates, the very best of luck.

Both will be facilitators after taking the two day GSE hands-on lab; Dennis will be the happy face at the back of the class Forensics 610: Reverse-Engineering Malware: Hands-On Analysis Tools and Techniques with Lenny Zeltser and Ash will Rob Lee’s whipping boy in Forensics 508: Advanced Computer Forensic Analysis and Incident Response

 

Other than personal drive to pass the GSE, SANS and the GIAC folks GSE qualification has been voted:

 

GIAC GSE Awarded Best Professional Certification Program by SC Magazine 2011

http://www.sans.org/press/giac-gse-best-professional-certification-program-sc-awards-2011.php

 

It’s fantastic to be among the few to have achieved the qualification, so why not line it up for your next goal in 2012?

 

*As Ash is from the far north Australia, he will be hard to understand. Be friendly – pat him on the head and hand a prawn fresh off the “Bar-bee” followed by six strong drinks.

Useful Web sites for Study

Oops, left this sitting in drafts rather than publish this last month.

Some useful web sites I use to keep me up to date and  help out studying Security and all things SANS.

The SANS Reading Room www.sans.org/reading_room/
The Honeypot Challenges www.honeynet.org/challenges
The Ethical Hacker www.ethicalhacker.net
Pauldotcom http://pauldotcom.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

Darkreading room www.darkreading.com
SANS forensic blog http://computer-forensics.sans.org/

Metasploit unleased www.offensive-security.com/metasploit-unleashed/Metasploit_Unleashed_Information_Security_Training
Internet Storm Center http://isc.sans.edu/index.html
Security Tube www.securitytube.net

Why I wanted to take the GSE Exam and have you along for the ride

I posted the following to a couple of lists to get people thinking about getting off that fence and sign up for the GSE exam. I’ve re-posted here for posterity.

Hello All,

Jeff Frisk and the folks at GIAC have made a significant effort in making the GSE exam available to more of us to attempt.

I have applied for the GSE 2010 challenge and hope to convince a few more of you to sign up with me.

If you have spent the time, energy and money to get pre-requisites for the GSE exam http://www.giac.org/certifications/gse.php#prereq then, from my limit viewpoint, only three things stand in the way: time, money and confidence.

Time:

Good grief, why did no-one warn me about this in the first place?

Time is the most valuable and unforgiving part of this trinity of obstacles.

It’s a lot of time so far and I’m only squaring up for the multiple choice. I’m spending about an hour a day revising and reviewing. Playing with the tools and challenges from the books is pure geek fun, but factor in about six hours a week. These numbers may have to increase, especially on dreaded *nix OS knowledge, which is a bit of – or a gaping hole – a weakness of mine.

None of this time is wasted as it improves on my skills and knowledge, which equates (hopefully) to increased market worth. Yes, it means juggling some of the junk out of my life to make time for study. I, sadly, now don’t watch the Biggest Loser or the Bachelor anymore. I refuse to give up House, 24, the occasional drinks after work and having a life though.

As always, I take my hat off to those with families who still make time to spend time to excel at their profession. It’s not easy to spend so much time lock away in a room away from loved ones and friends. Still, this effort can lead to opportunities in the future that benefit them directly.

Money:

Exam fees, travel, accommodation and time off work are the major financial costs.

With any staff/business cost, it needs to be justified and measured again a return on investment for with the business sees benefit for. For the GSE exam itself, I wrote a business case from my boss in the advantages having me attempt the GSE. As an example, I put forward most of the study effort would be done in my own time and they are directly benefitting from what I’m striving for. By applying my increased knowledge, awareness and skills to our environment I could better serve the security needs of our business. They agreed to pay for the exam fees and time off, but I picked up travel and accommodation to the States. As I live in Australia, that was a fun conversation to convince the better-half of the overseas travel costs, especial to somewhere like Las Vegas.

No certification will magically increase my salary overnight, but it can be a powerful motivator and differentiator at review or interview times. An added bonus, having the GSE avoids needing to recertify in your existing GIAC certifications. That’s a fair cost saving incentive to my company and a significant reduction of study hours.

Confidence:

It’s going to be a tough exam. I might fail. Would failing make me the black sheep of the security community or condemn in to corners at parties?

I think not.

Working on any major project by yourself is awful. However, get a group of determined, motivated, likeminded people working together toward the same goals, Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt (FUD) become distance memories. I found working with others helps me understand issues with greater clarity and removes a great deal of anxiety when dealing with complex topics, questions and problems.

Yes, I’m as nervous as heck and may crash and burn horribly, but if I do, that’s life and that’s an experience to not be forgotten. The more practice with real world challenges, whether I succeed or fail, provides invaluable experience. With a great group of people to training and study with, our chances of passing the GSE are only going to increase.

As a last parting shot to those still on the fence:

Without a critical mass of people having the GSE certification, it’s not going to go anywhere and SANS may have to drop it. We’re then stuck with industry bench marks qualifications that fail to prove anything more than you can pass exams on academic topics. Yes, that’s more than a touch sweeping but when I see hands on security jobs requiring only management orientated security qualifications, I despair; HR/management has once again written the job advert and they’re just using the expected, ill-informed industry base line of security skills. So why not get a some certifications up on the board we can aspire to that have real world value that can be measured?

I hear horror stories of the Cisco’s CCIE final lab exam pass rates. Despite around only 26% (according to Google searches) of first timers pass the $1250 exam, that doesn’t seem to stop them from retaking it and retaking it until they pass. The recognition and value of the exam allows companies to fund their staff until they pass, providing them to be seen as employing the best and brightest. Those that pass the qualification are proudly acknowledged as being top of their game, even by those that don’t know a switch from a box of cheese.

All I’m hoping for is a few people to take this exam with me. To be able to study and learn with and from others is an amazing boost and motivator. The IT security industry is still very young, and certifications may not be the best way forward, but currently they are all we have. Why not get one top end security qualification universally recognised as worthwhile, value for money and hands-on=ability validating by people from inside and outside of the IT industry? The GSE could be the first of those if we, the security community, get it there.

I hope at least a few of you sign up or convince a friend, colleague or fellow student to that step with me.

Sorry for the length of the post. It started out as two paragraphs and then I got caught up….

Preparing for the GSE multiple choice written exam

My approach to the multiple choice exam, was to treat it like any normal 500 level SANS exam.

My target – life-, work- and proctor-willing, is to take the exam on Saturday the 20th March 2010; which is exactly 42 days from now. As we all know 42 is the mean of Life or is that just a spooky coincidence?

I’m going to use an individual index system of each of the 3 courseware (401, 503 and 504). I have a brand new, lined A4 wire bound note book in which I’m handwriting the index of each book.

My goal is to have the 503 books indexed in seven days, then 504 indexed in seven days followed by the monstrous 401 fully indexed in ten days.

The rationale behind this is

1)      To make me read each page of each book and work out if that page should be indexed

2)      To make me read and think about each topic on the page

3)      For me to make side notes on tools, topics or subjects that are unclear

4)      I want to retain and use the knowledge for the practical exam

5)      I like using pen and paper

To make sure I don’t become just book smart, I plan to also run through the practical questions and exercises throughout the courseware books.

I been pretty active with hands on training from studying and passing SANS Advanced Security Essentials – Enterprise Defender (SEC501) and Offensive Security’s Pentesting with Backtrack, but intend to use some of the following sites to keep sharp:

Pauldotcom’s links to challenges, tools and a variety of other madness http://www.pauldotcom.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page and not to mention actually listening to the podcast

The web site of the three Spanish GSE http://www.radajo.com/ they set a huge benchmark to reach

The internet storm centre for what’s going down in the real world http://isc.sans.org/

The ethical hacker forums can post up some interesting links to other challenges http://www.ethicalhacker.net/

Ed Skoudis and friends various devious, mind-twisting and nefarious challenges http://www.counterhack.net/Counter_Hack/Challenges.html

Mr Skoudis and friends again with command line kung fu in all shapes and flavours  http://blog.commandlinekungfu.com/

Laura Chappell is always fantastic for packets and wireshark http://laurachappell.blogspot.com/

Richard Bejtlich still pops up some great snort and packet stuff despite being a boss now ;-) http://taosecurity.blogspot.com

The SANS reading room for a brilliant reading resource and new ideas http://www.sans.org/reading_room/

The GSE Practical Exam 2010

Months of waiting, debating about what might occur, what they may ask, what would be required and the occasional bits of study all came to a head on Saturday the 19th of September 2010, in Caesar’s Palace, Las Vegas, Nevada in the United States of America.

I got there two days before, in a vague attempt to shake off any jet lag effects and to get into the Vegas flow. Nice idea, but the execution failed abysmally. It may have been due to the excited anticipation, nerves or the simple desire to get on with it, take the damnable thing and have done with it. Meeting up with two other GSE candidates, who’d also arrived early, only proved how much the three of us had no idea what was really going to happen over the two days. Many of my personal thoughts stretched from the ridiculous that it would just be the practice examples from the three courses in the books, to some mix of the Bourne movies, involving being hunted, tortured and escaping all while having to set up Snort alerts and using Netcat to defeat the bad guys.

The only thing I really knew was that it was two days for testing taken from the SANS courses of 401, 503 and 504 and that the ring leader of this circus, Jeff Pike, was a man of mystery. Mr Pike cruelly tantalised us with brief emails, each of which gave a tiny hint on what was going to happen at the exam. My over-active imagination pictured Jeff as a classic Bond evil mastermind villain, sitting in his high-backed leather chair, cackling – in an evil mastermind way – flipping switches labeled Doom, Pain, Mayhem and Café-latte Decaf with a twist of hazelnut and lemon. I’d imagine him ordering his minions to stop feeding the sharks, set the booby traps and prepare for the would-be GSEs.

Anyway, away from ramblings of my deluded mind, Saturday morning 8am arrived. Caesars Palace’s huge Italian styled hallways of its conference centre and archway entrance to the exam room, did nothing to detract from the imagined Herculean tasks ahead.

The architect of my fears over the last few months, Jeff Pike was sitting at the head of the room, bathed in the glow of reflected laptop screens arrayed around him. Looking up, he saw me entering the room in a natty, and very fashionable, grey linen suit, hair flowing heroically with forced, nonchalant bring-it-on grin slapped on my face. In a freakish fast motion he was up and striding towards me.

Cue dramatic, sweeping music and fade to black.

The GSE Practical Exam

I’m not going to comment on what the exam contained over the two days. The GSE practical exam subject matter is laid out on the web site, so take your cues from there.

Nine people took the exam; a very mixed bunch of skills, experiences and job roles. I knew each of them from traded emails, sneaky peaks at LinkedIn profiles, blogs, postings and some from the books they had written. I took a small comfort that the group, as a whole, seemed pretty nervous.

I will say that the GSE exam is split in to four, four hour sessions over the two days and it’s about using the skills and knowledge learnt in the three SANS course to deal with real world scenarios in a compressed time frame. It’s not just a “do you know it and how to do it”, but “can you do it” in the time allocated. Jeff or a proctor (Charles, in the case) is in the room at all times and there to answer any question on the exam or help with any odd problems that pop up. There is no group presentation objective any more, which was a bit disappointing, so the entire GSE exam is a solo effort.

You need to have a laptop that runs VMWare images, has over 2GB of RAM and you have full admin rights over. It shouldn’t, much to my embarrassment, be massively locked down and specially harden. That caused one or two problems, which I really didn’t need during the exam as you will be connected to a segmented network at some point. Basically bring a basic patched OS that just simply works on, is pretty much set to all defaults and you could happily format once you’ve finished the exam – should you want to.

You can bring in up to a suit case worth of written material and have access to the internet from a couple of isolated laptops to refer to at any point during the exam. It’s pretty fitting to have access to notes and the web as it’s only very rare cases I’ve been locked in a room without some form of reference. I had every cheat sheet under the sun, a copy of security Fedora 12 and my Don’t Panic –a guide to the GSE. This is a booklet I’d created when recording all the crazy tests, examples, exercises, trivia, trials and tribulations from the testing I’d put myself through over the last few months.

Once I broke through the initial nerves, I really started to enjoy the exam. Some parts I flew through and other parts I want to throw the laptop through the wall. Some parts completely stumped me and others left me grinning like a Cheshire cat, but I worked through each and double checked what I could. After the first day ended, we were all wired and still energized. I chatted with a couple of the guys on way back to the hotel on how they approach the objectives on the way, just to understand what approach they had taken. Around 2am, I snapped awake and realised I’d cocked up a response. Sleep didn’t come easy after that.

I want to say the second day was calmer, as we knew the level of testing to be expected. There was definitely a buzz of excitement and anticipation going in to the exam, as we’d discussed a number of guesses what was going to be tested on. Again, a day of highs and lows, with parts I felt I sail through on the Sea of Easy and those that sank me on the rough Seas of What the Heck and the fatal jagged rocks of WTF. Jeff Frisk, Director of GIAC, sent in a trolley full of cold beers and dips in the last hour of the second day’s exam. I couldn’t work out if it was some weird form of mental torture, in order to apply a final piece of pressure in that precious hour.

After time was called and exam was ended, the mixed look of relief, frustration, reflection, puzzlement, excitement and sheer pleasure just to be finally done was on the group’s faces. We all took a long drink, shook hands, rolled out eyes at the questions and answer given. A group of SANS instructors, Jeff Frisk, and current GSE magically appeared to offer their congratulations for taking the exam and making it to the end -and steal a beer or two. Jeff Pike had one final joke to spring on us. The results of the GSE would not be reviled until after 30 days once we’d completed the exam. With the large number of people taking the exam they need to triple check our answers with multiple reviewers and confirm if we passed enough questions successfully. Each of the sections is marked separately, as they demonstrate different knowledge and skills. I guess you need to reach a base score in each section to hit the pass mark of the GSE, as it’s a pass or fail exam with no scoring revealed. I’m not sure if that’s a good or bad thing, but it’s just the way of the world.

Should You Attempt the GSE?

If you have the exam skills and qualification requirements, then it’s simple. Book the exam
now
. The exam is hard but fair, very real world based and uses from the knowledge and skills of the three courses. No annoyingly vague or trivia based knowledge questions appeared, but you have to be good under pressure and able to work to deadlines.

If you can respond to an event or incident, analysis the information and present your findings clearly while working to a strict time line, you should take the GSE. The test and objectives flowed well and was in a very logical format, but allowed for personal styles to work in their own fashion to present their answers. If you are a well-rounded security professional, being comfortable with completing the exercises in any of the three SANS courses and smart enough to read into the hints on the GSE requirements, plus be able to clearly communicate findings on to paper, take the GSE.

To me the GSE qualification is about challenging myself to prove I ‘m able to stand shoulder to shoulder with my peers; a virtual marathon or mountain to climb, if you will. Finishing or the view from the top is amazing, but the determination, effort and sheer grit to attempt such a goal in the first place is worth of admiration and a nod respect for trying to improve yourself from your peers. I’ve been lucky enough to sit in classes with skilled classmates, talked to brilliant people in hallways and worked with amazing fellow workplace facilitators who could easily be in the next round of GSE candidates if they want to be. All it takes is making the financial and mental commitment to sign up. It is a good chunk of money and time, but doesn’t anything worth achieving have a price?

More Suggestions on GSE preparation

My top tip is not to attempt the exam with jet lag. At one point I thought the room went green and at several stages I swear objects started moving by themselves. Really.

  1. Find someone to study with and bounce questions off. This really helps as you get to look at differing ideas and directions. I occasionally get stuck in one particular direction and mindset which means I fail to grasp the meaning, question or objective without spending a lot more time the really necessary.
  2. Mentor or teach others. The SANS mentor program is a heck of a way to get a better understanding the SANS material and help others to learn security, it also makes you read related subjects and topics. Even if you don’t lead any SANS training, do security talks at local user group meetings, help a friend or colleague pass and exam or even just explain to your parents how to stay safe online. Create a couple of security awareness programs at work, one for the technical and one of the non-technical staff.
  3. Read good quality blogs and books. When researching GSE objectives and topics, I spent quite a bit of time searching the web for decent examples. I’m sure no-one is amazed to read that there’s a huge amount of poorly written, ill-informed and just plain wrong pieces out there.
  4. Watch good webcasts or recorded sessions. I’m quite slow sometimes and watching someone perform the steps in front of me, with the ability to stop pause and rewind, means I can grasp the information a lot faster.
  5. Ask others. There are some wonderful people out there that actually answer questions, even when it’s a complete stranger. I had some responses from book authors, security royalty, and well informed normal security guys and girls, none of which knew anything about me but freely and very generously spend time answering questions or correcting misperceptions.
  6. Review Jeff Pike’s presentation on GSE: facts, rumours and myths - Sadly, this didn’t get recorded so all the abuse he gave me will remain in that Vegas room :) The slides from that day are here and worth a look.

Final Thoughts

Whether I pass or fail the GSE, it’s been an amazing experience. I’ve learnt diverse materials and skills, much more than my current job role requires, even in areas I simply have no current requirement for. As I’ve mentioned before, we have a couple of *Nix systems out of thousands of Windows systems, but none of what I’ve studied, practiced and now learnt will go to waste. The other GSE candidates are normal, very smart and motivated people who are true security professionals. I’m proud and humbled to have attempted the same exam as them. I still have a have a long way to go before I’d ever think of calling myself a security expert, but I now know I can cope, handle and deal with real security incidents in a professional manner under pressure and others watchful eyes. The GSE would be a seal of approve and validation from GIAC that I can do this and an excellent affirmation of the teaching skills and abilities of my SANS instructors.

Do I think I’ve passed?

I’ll tell you in thirty days.

Offensive Security’s Wifu exam – All over, red rover

Finally.

Took the exam tonight, completed all the required challenges and sent off the proof to be marked.

I had a few minor problems trying to get my connection details to start the exam, but these were swift resolve by one of the very able admins in the IRC #offsec channel. He was a gentleman and got me underway swiftly.

The actual exam is straightforward and is derived from the course material. Learn and study the material, be able to do all the practicals on your own systems and you should pass.

Unlike the PWB course, this is designed for beginners to wireless theory and attacks. The wifu course provides a solid grounding in the 802.11x fundamentals and is a well balanced, straightforward introduction, but is focused toward WEP.

Obviously WEP is still alive and well, so the content is still relevant but if you’re looking for more in-depth and all encompassing wireless technologies, such as Bluetooth, Zigbee, and so on , Joshua Wright’s SANS Wireless Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing, and Defenses would be more appropriate.

Anyway, it was a fun hour and a bit exam and I can claim my 10 CPE for all that work too!

 

GIAC Security Expert (GSE) certification

I decided to take a very large leap and attempt one of the toughest, non-specialised, security exams out there, the GIAC Security Expert (GSE) certification

As of today only 16 people hold this qualification. I’ve meet a few of those that hold this certification and am in no doubt they know their security stuff.

I have to pass a grueling multiple choice exam comprising of 150 question from three SANS courses, 401, 503 and 504, in three hours. Pass mark is 75% – that’s 114 out of the 150 questions.

That’s one foot and a quarter of study and review. Roughly around five kilos of SANS books.

When (note the positive thinking and projection) I pass that then I get allowed to attempt the two day practical hands on lab and exam. This is currently only held in the States.

I’m going to chart my tears, sweat, study, practice labs and progress on here for what I hope to be many, many more folk to become GSE certified. 

Why do this to myself?

This is for me to see how much of the years of studying and training on the defensive side has actually sunk in. The two day practical will push me out of any comfort zone I’d like to hide in and give me a real experience of dealing with people a heck of a lot smarter than I am while explaining what I did to protect their systems while under fire. I want to see how I handle this type of situation and pressure.

To me this is more about the experience of those two days and proving I can survive them, than gaining the title of GSE.

A current GSE, Kevin Bong has written this piece on the GSE  and it’s well worth the time to read.

Offensive Security’s Backtrack Wifu – here we go again

I’ve booked myself on to this course.

This time I blame Ash for making me take this one, but the deluded voices in my head also have something to answer for.

Four months to get to grips with the 25 hours of study material and play with exercises. Should be simple right?

What is this training I speak of, well this from the web site:

“Offensive Security Wireless Attacks”, also known as “BackTrack WiFu” is a course designed for penetration testers and security enthusiasts who need to learn to implement various active and passive Wireless (802.11 2.4 GHz) attacks. The course is based on the Wireless Attack suite – Aircrack-ng.

The course was designed by Thomas d’Otreppe and Mati Aharoni in an attempt to organize and summarize today’s relevant WiFi attacks. This course will kick-start your WiFu abilities, and get you cracking WEP and WPA using the latest tools and attacks in no time!

http://www.offensive-security.com/backtrack-wifu-online-training.php

This should be fun, and hopefully not quite as a steep learning curve as Penetration Testing with BackTrack.

Time will tell.

How to fail the Offensive Security 101 Exam

Being generous of nature, I thought I’d share how to stuff up the exam of Offensive Security 101 course. All the blog postings I’ve found on the exam is how they succeed. Well this is a bit different. I managed to get a remarkable poor result which I can attribute to the following:

  • Not being prepared to spend the full 24 hours to complete the exam
  • Not having the right mind set to work through processes and think like an attacker
  • Not documenting fully and double checking and confirming results
  • Not taking a fresh air breaks
  • Not having enough experience
  • Quite possibly being a whiner

For mere mortals, like myself, that don’t spend time looking for applications and systems to attack, the simple frustration of working through each service to find a hole to get a foot hold is “interesting”*.

*Insert swear words of choice

When attacking a system, the process is simple:

  1. Find a live IP address
  2. Discover the services on the IP address
  3. Search for vulnerabilities for that service

After that successful discovery process, I developed this totally unsuccessful process steps:

  1. Ignore the blinding obvious results from your own scans
  2. Spend ages Googling and finding nothing that really fits
  3. Grasp at straws and download anything that had the service name in it or sounds vaguely like it.
  4. Try to adapt code that mostly wasn’t going to work, while not understanding how the author was attempting to do it in the first place
  5. Watch the poorly complied code fail to do anything and wonder why I didn’t have a root shell prompt
  6. Stare into space for long periods
  7. Muttering to myself
  8. Contemplate a career in herding mice with elephants, blowing stuff up or becoming a reality-tv star
  9. Come up with something equally unlikely to work
  10. Back to step 1

After a number of hours of going through this process it’s somewhat disheartening, especially when you seem to get zip-all back. Letting all that frustration build up and not taking time to have a break is how to fail the exam. Simple :-)

The exam –a post mortem

While reviewing of what went wrong during the exam, a friend commented that I should be used to dealing with similar frustrations as a sys admin. My response was without experience of the methods to get a foot hole, you effectively end up throwing mud at the target and see what sticks. As a Sys Admin, that’s usually the last resort, which you should never do with production systems.

As a great example of this, I was oddly very hesitant to run things that I didn’t really understand that could break it. I struggled to get the simple statement the lab machine are there to be broken. It was weird, I build hundreds of machines each year with the purpose of testing – and invariably breaking them , so why was this different?

It wasn’t different, it was a failure of adjusting my mindset to fit the situation and letting implied pressure of the exam get to me. I’d read other blogs about how people struggled and let their stories compound the “this is going to be really hard” mindset. I hit a wall at a certain point and refused to attempt to climb it.

That’s when I failed.

I honestly though “Well I’m crap at this, let’s never bother with penetration testing again and I’ll stick with my day job.”

Take Two

This where friends, time and a good night’s sleep make the world of difference.

The few days after the failing the exam I gathered up all my notes and records, review them and cleared them up in to an ordered fashion. I realised I had a huge amount of information I hadn’t applied, taken in to account or even tried. With some, okay – a lot, encouragement from friends the exam re-booked.I had twenty days to get back on the program. I did some serious reading and re-practicing of some of the lessons, while attacking home built systems.

My second exam try was a very different experience. I went in with goals and enforced break times. My notes and thoughts were well detailed and ordered. I review my notes and findings after each break, which helped keep a clear perspective of what I was doing and what I’d tried. This time round I completed the exam in 8 hours, successfully getting all the targets in that time. I still made some stupid mistakes, but being able to review my notes I corrected my mistakes after taking a break or two. The only real mistake I didn’t correct was burning the same pot twice while attempting to cook pasta during food breaks. Oops.

Lessons Learnt

Failing the exam was actually a great lesson in itself and worth the 12 hours I spend feeling sorry for myself , staring at “impossible” targets to hack during the first exam. I knew the targets could be hacked, but by putting them in the” too hard bucket” I wasn’t giving myself a fair chance.

Top three tips

Study with someone else, great to bounce ideas off and helps get a better understanding of questions and topics.

Lurk in the IRC chat room and troll through the forums, there’s great gems in there.

Remember to review your findings and double check your findings. It’s all too easy to make simple mistakes and get dishearten despite having the right freakin’ answer all along.

Thanks Damian and Ash for your encouragement and having to put up with my whining/rants.